ASIC Considers Action as Professional Indemnity Insurance Transparency Falls Short
ASIC Considers Action as Professional Indemnity Insurance Transparency Falls Short
1
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has voiced apprehension about the transparency of professional indemnity (PI) insurance amongst holders of the Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSLs).
This concern arises from a recent market overview conducted to analyze PI insurance for AFSLs offering personal advice to retail clients.
The market study revealed two primary issues: the lack of transparency in PI coverage and the extended durations required for claims resolution. In response, ASIC is exploring potential measures to address these challenges. Jared Timms, a partner at Howden Broking, emphasized the critical role of brokers in ensuring comprehensive communication with underwriters about the client's services. Timms advised against focusing solely on policy cost, noting that working with local carriers might streamline claims handling.
Since 2020, ASIC has observed a notable decline in the number of AFSLs experiencing PI-related compliance issues, including a decrease in AFSLs seeking waivers for PI requirements. The review also discovered market enhancements such as increased supply, competitive dynamics, premium reductions, and a return to profitability, signifying a recovery since the Hayne Royal Commission-induced exodus in 2019.
Despite these improvements, a Financial Services Council green paper recently critiqued ASIC's oversight on AFSL PI coverage.
The finality of PI claims and the ambiguity surrounding insurance coverage are pivotal issues for the financial services sector. Inadequate PI insurance can leave AFSLs and their clients vulnerable to financial risk, undermining trust in the financial advice industry. For consumers, clear and reliable PI coverage ensures accountability and protection, whereas for AFSLs, it represents a safeguard against claims-related financial duress.
Looking forward, ASIC's initiatives to enhance transparency and oversight, alongside evolving PI insurance market conditions, could herald substantial changes in the regulatory landscape. Expert commentary implies that aligning PI policies with client needs will remain crucial. Concurrently, the introduction of an updated Financial Advisers Register data set, from 15 August 2025, signals a strengthened compliance framework, demanding accuracy in recording adviser qualifications and pathways.
AFSLs are now mandated to update ASIC on any discrepancies within 30 business days to sidestep penalties. ASIC's spot checks have highlighted inaccuracies in the registration of financial advisers, leading to warnings and reprimands. Such compliance measures aim to uphold the regulatory integrity of AFSL operations.
Published:Tuesday, 12th Aug 2025 Source: Paige Estritori
An insurance dispute arose when a driver was refused coverage for car damage after evidence showed involvement in multiple collisions, contrary to her claim. Initially, the woman filed a claim with Hollard Insurance, stating her car had collided once with another vehicle. However, the situation took a turn when forensic data from in-car technology revealed two separate impacts occurring 11 minutes apart. - read more
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has voiced apprehension about the transparency of professional indemnity (PI) insurance amongst holders of the Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSLs). This concern arises from a recent market overview conducted to analyze PI insurance for AFSLs offering personal advice to retail clients. - read more
A savvy traveller has successfully challenged an insurance decision after having to make an impromptu stay in London due to a medical emergency. This came after the man needed urgent medical attention following a cat bite he sustained in Albania, which sent him to the UK capital for essential treatment. - read more
In the age of instant digital services, where everything from basic necessities to luxury items can be delivered in a blink, the life insurance sector in Australia is poised for a transformative change. Historically plagued by lengthy processing times, the sector faces a persistent underinsurance gap, with over a million Australians lacking adequate life protection. The introduction of a digital Personal Medical Attendant Report (PMAR) by Acenda, formerly MLC Life, marks a significant stride towards addressing this challenge. - read more
A Victorian court has ratified a $34 million settlement in a class action involving add-on insurance products sold by Suncorp. This settlement culminates the legal proceedings surrounding alleged unlawful sales practices. - read more
Jet skiing is an exhilarating water sport enjoyed by many Australians. Whether you are a seasoned rider or a beginner, having adequate insurance for your jet ski is crucial. - read more
Jet skiing offers an exhilarating mix of high speeds and open water, but it also comes with its share of risks. Just like any valuable property, a jet ski needs protection, not just from potential damage, but also the liabilities that come with operating it. This is where jet ski insurance becomes essential. Having the right insurance coverage ensures that you are financially and legally protected should an accident or damage occur. - read more
JetSkis have become increasingly popular in Australia, gracing our stunning coastlines and lakes with their thrilling presence. For many, owning a JetSki represents freedom, adventure, and a gateway to unforgettable experiences on the water. - read more
Welcome, Jet Ski enthusiasts! Whether you’re hitting the waves for the first time or are a seasoned rider, ensuring your watercraft is covered by the right insurance is essential. - read more
Having the right jet ski insurance is crucial for any Australian jet ski owner. It's not just about complying with legal requirements but also ensuring peace of mind when you're out enjoying the water. - read more
Knowledgebase
Subrogation: The process by which an insurance company seeks to recover the amount paid to the policyholder from a third party responsible for the loss.
