Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has announced significant reforms to the capital treatment of longevity products, including annuities, aiming to bolster the retirement income market. These changes, set to take effect on 1 July 2026, are designed to encourage innovation and improve the availability of products that provide Australians with financial security in retirement. - read more
Recent data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) reveals a significant rise in life insurance disputes, with total and permanent disablement (TPD) and disability income insurance (DII) claims accounting for 88% of all disputes in the 12 months ending December 2025. This trend underscores ongoing challenges within the industry, particularly concerning the management and assessment of disability-related claims. - read more
After enduring six years of decline following the Royal Commission, Australia's life insurance market is showing promising signs of recovery. In the second quarter of 2025, the sector experienced a 20.7% increase in new business volumes, marking a significant turnaround and offering a glimmer of hope for the industry's future. - read more
HESTA, a prominent Australian superannuation fund, has unveiled a series of changes aimed at providing more accessible and affordable insurance coverage for its members. Effective from 1 July 2026, these adjustments include an average 12% reduction in insurance fees across all cover types, encompassing death, total and permanent disablement (TPD), and income protection cover. - read more
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has finalised amendments to its prudential standards concerning the capital treatment of longevity products, including annuities. These reforms, set to take effect on 1 July 2026, are designed to bolster the market for retirement income products by supporting innovation and reducing unnecessary regulatory constraints, all while maintaining robust prudential safeguards. - read more
Owning a jet ski can bring endless excitement and fun in the water, but it also comes with its own set of risks. Jet ski insurance is essential for protecting both your watercraft and yourself from unforeseen circumstances. - read more
JetSkis have become increasingly popular in Australia, gracing our stunning coastlines and lakes with their thrilling presence. For many, owning a JetSki represents freedom, adventure, and a gateway to unforgettable experiences on the water. - read more
Jet skiing is immensely popular in Australia, where the expansive coastlines and beautiful waterways offer the perfect setting for thrilling aquatic adventures. - read more
Having the right jet ski insurance is crucial for any Australian jet ski owner. It's not just about complying with legal requirements but also ensuring peace of mind when you're out enjoying the water. - read more
The thrill of slicing through the waves on a Jet Ski holds a special allure for many Aussies. But as any seasoned rider will tell you, the key to uninterrupted fun on the water lies in consistent maintenance. Not only does this ensure your Jet Ski remains in peak condition, but it also extends its life, enhances safety, and can save you a bundle on potential repairs. - read more
Knowledgebase
Peril: A specific risk or cause of loss covered by an insurance policy, such as fire, theft, or flood.
