Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has recently taken decisive action to address significant concerns within the commercial auto insurance sector. In response to widespread industry protests over substantial premium increases, APRA has introduced emergency regulations aimed at safeguarding transport operators from financial hardship. - read more
As the Australian insurance industry navigates a rapidly evolving landscape, Deloitte's 2026 Insurance Predictions report highlights two pivotal trends poised to reshape the sector: the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and the adoption of advanced climate risk modeling. - read more
In a significant development for policyholders, leading Australian life insurer TAL has announced the expansion of its Health Sense Plus program to encompass income protection (IP) policies. Effective from 8 August 2025, this initiative aims to incentivise proactive health management by offering premium discounts to clients who engage in preventative health checks. - read more
The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has recently ruled in favour of a policyholder who inadvertently cancelled his critical illness insurance due to unclear communication from his insurer, TAL Life. This decision underscores the critical importance of transparent communication between insurers and their clients, particularly regarding the implications of policy modifications. - read more
AIA Australia has recently updated its Priority Protection life insurance suite, introducing changes designed to simplify discounts, enhance policy clarity, and support premium affordability. These enhancements, effective from 9 November 2025, reflect AIA's commitment to providing value-driven solutions for policyholders. - read more
Jet skiing is a thrilling water sport that has seen a surge in popularity across Australia's beautiful coastlines and waterways. With adrenaline-packed action and the joy of gliding over the waves, it's no wonder why so many Aussies are taking up the reins of these aquatic speed machines. The excitement of jet skiing not only provides an exceptional leisure activity but also offers a unique way to explore the stunning aquatic landscapes that Australia boasts. - read more
Jet ski insurance is an essential coverage option for anyone who owns a jet ski. While some jet ski owners may not see the need for insurance, it is important to understand the risks involved in owning a jet ski without insurance and the legal implications of not having coverage. - read more
Maintaining your jet ski isn't just about keeping it looking good; it's crucial for ensuring longevity and optimal performance on the water. Engaging in regular maintenance can significantly extend the life of your jet ski and help avoid costly repairs. Whether you're slicing through the waves or enjoying a leisurely cruise, a well-maintained jet ski provides a reliable and enjoyable experience for riders of all levels. - read more
Embracing the Australian lifestyle often involves making the most of the surrounding waters, and there's hardly a more exhilarating way to do so than aboard a jet ski. Owning one offers a unique blend of adventure and excitement as you skip over the waves at thrilling speeds. The sense of freedom that comes with piloting your own jet ski is unmatched, making it a favored weekend activity for thrill-seekers and water sports enthusiasts alike. - read more
Owning a jet ski is exciting and offers countless hours of fun on the water. However, with the thrill comes the responsibility of ensuring your jet ski is protected. This is where having the right jet ski insurance becomes crucial. - read more
Knowledgebase
Moral Hazard: The concept that individuals may take on more risk when they do not bear the full consequences of that risk, often relevant in insurance scenarios.
