Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
The Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) has released a report forecasting a substantial decline in broadacre farm profits, projecting a 70% decrease to approximately $65,000 per farm. This downturn is attributed to escalating input costs and persistent drought conditions affecting various regions. - read more
Recent research from WFI Insurance reveals that only 25% of Australian farmers are considering cyber insurance, despite approximately 80% of farms now utilising some form of agricultural technology (agri-tech). This disparity highlights a significant vulnerability within the sector, as increased digitisation exposes farms to potential cyber threats. - read more
In the face of increasing climate variability, Australian agriculture is shifting its approach by integrating sustainability into core risk management strategies. This evolution reflects a broader recognition that environmental stewardship is intrinsically linked to the resilience and long-term viability of farming operations. - read more
In March 2026, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) took decisive action to address significant premium hikes in the commercial auto insurance sector. Responding to widespread industry concerns, APRA issued emergency regulations to freeze unjustified baseline premium increases exceeding 25%, pending external review. This intervention aims to protect independent transport operators and logistics enterprises from immediate financial strain. - read more
Emergence Insurance has announced the acquisition of Blue Zebra's cyber insurance portfolio, marking a significant expansion of its cyber risk offerings in the Australian market. This move is set to bolster Emergence's capabilities in providing comprehensive cyber insurance solutions to businesses across the country. - read more
Maintaining your jet ski is an essential task that goes beyond keeping it looking great; it's about ensuring its longevity and, most importantly, your safety on the water. Every enthusiast knows that the thrill of cutting through the waves comes with the responsibility of regular upkeep. Neglecting maintenance can lead to breakdowns, or worse, hazardous situations at sea that could have been easily avoided. - read more
Jet ski insurance is an essential coverage option for anyone who owns a jet ski. While some jet ski owners may not see the need for insurance, it is important to understand the risks involved in owning a jet ski without insurance and the legal implications of not having coverage. - read more
Welcome, Jet Ski enthusiasts! Whether you’re hitting the waves for the first time or are a seasoned rider, ensuring your watercraft is covered by the right insurance is essential. - read more
Jet skiing is immensely popular in Australia, where the expansive coastlines and beautiful waterways offer the perfect setting for thrilling aquatic adventures. - read more
Jet skiing is a thrilling water sport that has seen a surge in popularity across Australia's beautiful coastlines and waterways. With adrenaline-packed action and the joy of gliding over the waves, it's no wonder why so many Aussies are taking up the reins of these aquatic speed machines. The excitement of jet skiing not only provides an exceptional leisure activity but also offers a unique way to explore the stunning aquatic landscapes that Australia boasts. - read more
Knowledgebase
Insurable Interest: A financial or other kind of interest in the insured item or person, necessary for a valid insurance contract.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.