Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
A reported ransomware incident affecting Mackay Sugar has put agricultural cyber risk back in the spotlight, this time with a clear lesson for producers who depend on processors, contractors and shared infrastructure. ABC Rural reported on 18 June 2026 that a Russian-speaking ransomware operation known as The Gentlemen had claimed responsibility for a cyber attack that disrupted two Mackay Sugar mills, with the company working to verify the claim and restart Farleigh and Racecourse mills in stages. - read more
The Australian Government has released the Hearing Services Program Provider Notice 2026-4, confirming that the updated Schedule of Service Items and Fees 2026-27 is now available. While the notice is highly specific to hearing service providers, it carries a broader message for allied health businesses: regulatory changes rarely sit neatly in one folder. They can affect billing, consent, scope of practice, client communications and, ultimately, the way professional risks are insured. - read more
New broker compliance data has put a spotlight on an issue that matters to every fitness professional who relies on public liability, professional indemnity or broader business insurance: renewal timing and communication. On 18 June 2026, Insurance Business reported that the Insurance Brokers Code Compliance Committee`s 2025 Annual Data Report recorded 5,417 breaches of the Insurance Brokers Code of Practice affecting 14,842 clients. - read more
Australian consultants rely on timely, accurate insurance renewals to keep professional indemnity, public liability and other business covers aligned with current contracts. A recent annual compliance update from the insurance broking sector has underlined why renewal discipline matters: missed or late renewal contact was reported as the leading category of broker code breaches for the past year. - read more
Build Australia’s latest construction technology coverage, published on 16 June 2026, highlights how geographic information systems, or GIS, are moving beyond digital mapping to become a practical project tracking tool for modern construction sites. The report frames GIS as a way to connect dispersed teams, complex schedules, site conditions and operational data into a shared spatial view, helping project leaders make faster and better-informed decisions. - read more
Jet skiing is an exhilarating water sport that offers thrills and adventures. However, like any other activity involving high speeds and open waters, it comes with its own set of risks. - read more
Welcome, Jet Ski enthusiasts! Whether you’re hitting the waves for the first time or are a seasoned rider, ensuring your watercraft is covered by the right insurance is essential. - read more
For many Australians, a jet ski is a source of exhilarating aquatic adventures and cherished memories with family and friends. As much as jet ski ownership brings joy and excitement, it carries inherent risks and responsibilities. One crucial aspect of responsible ownership is ensuring that you are adequately protected with the right jet ski insurance coverage. - read more
Having the right jet ski insurance is crucial for any Australian jet ski owner. It's not just about complying with legal requirements but also ensuring peace of mind when you're out enjoying the water. - read more
Jet skiing offers an exhilarating mix of high speeds and open water, but it also comes with its share of risks. Just like any valuable property, a jet ski needs protection, not just from potential damage, but also the liabilities that come with operating it. This is where jet ski insurance becomes essential. Having the right insurance coverage ensures that you are financially and legally protected should an accident or damage occur. - read more
Knowledgebase
Loss Ratio: The ratio of claims paid by an insurer to the premiums earned, used as a measure of profitability.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.