Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
In a significant development for the Australian life insurance industry, the Parliament has passed the Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Act 2025. This legislation, enacted on 1 April 2026, prohibits insurers from using genetic test results to influence underwriting decisions for life, income protection, or trauma insurance policies. The ban is set to take effect on 8 October 2026. - read more
The Australian life insurance industry is witnessing a significant increase in mental health-related claims, with recent data indicating that these claims now account for nearly one-third of all total and permanent disability (TPD) claims paid. This trend underscores the growing impact of mental health issues on the workforce and the broader community. - read more
AIA Australia CEO Damien Mu has raised concerns about the sustainability of the current life insurance model, citing rising mental health claims, increasing premiums, and ongoing cost-of-living pressures as key factors necessitating structural changes within the industry. - read more
In a developing situation in south-east Queensland, the Three Creeks Farm Stall, a popular farmers' market operating in Eileen Hose Park near Gympie, is facing potential eviction due to a dispute over public liability insurance requirements imposed by the Gympie Regional Council. - read more
Recent data from the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) reveals a significant increase in complaints against insurance companies, with an average of 100 complaints per day. This surge is primarily attributed to delays in processing everyday claims, affecting both home-building and motor vehicle insurance sectors. - read more
Jet ski insurance is an essential coverage option for anyone who owns a jet ski. While some jet ski owners may not see the need for insurance, it is important to understand the risks involved in owning a jet ski without insurance and the legal implications of not having coverage. - read more
Whether you’re a seasoned jet ski owner or a newcomer looking to make your first purchase, we know the excitement and joy that comes with riding the waves. - read more
Owning a jet ski can bring endless excitement and fun in the water, but it also comes with its own set of risks. Jet ski insurance is essential for protecting both your watercraft and yourself from unforeseen circumstances. - read more
Embracing the Australian lifestyle often involves making the most of the surrounding waters, and there's hardly a more exhilarating way to do so than aboard a jet ski. Owning one offers a unique blend of adventure and excitement as you skip over the waves at thrilling speeds. The sense of freedom that comes with piloting your own jet ski is unmatched, making it a favored weekend activity for thrill-seekers and water sports enthusiasts alike. - read more
Welcome, Jet Ski enthusiasts! Whether you’re hitting the waves for the first time or are a seasoned rider, ensuring your watercraft is covered by the right insurance is essential. - read more
Knowledgebase
Rider: An optional provision added to an insurance policy that provides additional benefits or coverage.
