Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
Broker Not Accountable for Passing on Insurer's Instructions
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
An Australian homeowner's effort to hold his insurance broker responsible for allegedly misleading him about coverage for emergency tree removal has been dismissed by regulatory authorities.
The incident unfolded following a storm that impaired trees on the insured premises.
Initially, the homeowner looked to claim a compensation from the insurer for clearing debris. However, he was informed that his policy would not cater to the removal of trees unless they caused damage to the property itself. Consequently, he took the matter to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), accusing his broker, Aon, of misguiding him in a conversation last December by implying that the insurer would bear the make-safe costs.
The homeowner presented AFCA with an invoice totaling $17,217 for tree removal to establish safe machinery access and an additional invoice of $7370 for further clearance. Aon contested the claim, asserting that their broker merely communicated the details relayed by the insurer to the complainant.
Aon backed its position with contact notes from the insurer which included recommendations to "remove dangerous hanging limbs as part of a make-safe, ensuring photos were taken of the removed limbs."
Records show that the broker had questioned the insurer about the policy's inapplicability concerning make-safe operations. "Our client has now been informed by the assessor that this 'make-safe' work is not covered - surely this would be considered make-safe work, given the alternative risks, such as electrocution or being hit by a falling tree or limb?” Bhupendranathmmmsiddharth_techtw, the email to the insurer reportedly asked.
AFCA’s ruling underscored that although the homeowner conducted the work thinking it would be covered by the policy, the actions of the broker were not prejudicial. The authority noted that the broker had diligently informed the client to document the procedures, yet there was no indication that a more extensive range of work was covered under the existing policy terms.
AFCA summized that in this event The broker did not make any remark or conduct any act that was misleading and deceptive, as it merely transmitted the information received from the insurer and that had the information provided been inaccurate, the fault lies not with the broker, but with the original source of information.
Additionally, AFCA clarified that even in instances of potentially misleading information, the homeowner may not have sustained a financial loss since the insurer would likely have not compensated for the make-safe work under any circumstances. Regardless of the insurance policy specifics, the complainant was obliged to conduct the necessary safety works. Even if there was incorrect information passed from the insurer by the broker, the liability cannot be placed on the broker by simply relaying what they were informed.
This decision supports the conclusion that Aon, as a broker, carried out its duty by correctly conveying the insurer's instructions and therefore, should not bear the burden of liability for the disputed costs.
This case offers a valuable lesson in understanding where liabilities begin and end in the complex web of insurer-broker-customer communications, reminding policyholders to scrutinize the fine details of insurance contracts.
Original information for this article was sourced from Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
In response to the escalating cyber threats targeting strata communities, CHU Underwriting Agencies has expanded its residential strata insurance policies to include cyber protection. This enhancement provides coverage of up to $50,000 for losses resulting from social engineering fraud, a prevalent form of cybercrime where perpetrators impersonate trusted contacts to manipulate payment instructions. - read more
CHU Underwriting Agencies has announced a significant increase in its single risk capacity, raising the limit to $690 million from the previous $300 million. This substantial enhancement enables CHU to better support larger residential and commercial strata developments across Australia. - read more
CHU, Australia's leading strata insurance underwriting agency, has released its 2025 State of the Strata Market report, providing a comprehensive analysis of the current state of the industry. The report offers valuable insights into premium movements, the impact of weather events, regulatory developments, and emerging risks affecting strata insurance. - read more
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has intensified its examination of Insurance Australia Group's (IAG) proposed acquisition of RAC Insurance, moving the process into a Phase 2 review. This decision underscores the regulator's concerns about the potential impact on competition within Western Australia's insurance market. - read more
As 2026 unfolds, Australian insurers have identified premium affordability as the foremost risk facing the industry. This shift in priority reflects the mounting pressures from inflation, escalating climate-related losses, and stringent regulatory requirements. - read more
Jet skiing is an exhilarating water sport enjoyed by many Australians. Whether you are a seasoned rider or a beginner, having adequate insurance for your jet ski is crucial. - read more
Jet skiing is an exhilarating water sport that offers thrills and adventures. However, like any other activity involving high speeds and open waters, it comes with its own set of risks. - read more
Jet skiing offers an exhilarating mix of high speeds and open water, but it also comes with its share of risks. Just like any valuable property, a jet ski needs protection, not just from potential damage, but also the liabilities that come with operating it. This is where jet ski insurance becomes essential. Having the right insurance coverage ensures that you are financially and legally protected should an accident or damage occur. - read more
Towing a disabled jet ski back to shore is a scenario that many water sports enthusiasts hope to never encounter. Yet, the importance of being prepared for such an event cannot be overstated. Whether caused by mechanical failure or unforeseen circumstances, when your jet ski succumbs while you’re out on the water, knowing how to securely tow it is essential for the safety of both yourself and your watercraft. - read more
Having the right jet ski insurance is crucial for any Australian jet ski owner. It's not just about complying with legal requirements but also ensuring peace of mind when you're out enjoying the water. - read more
Knowledgebase
Actuary: A professional who analyzes the financial costs of risk and uncertainty using mathematics, statistics, and financial theory.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.